<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title><![CDATA[Gizmodo: Apple]]></title>
		
		<link>http://gizmodo.com/tag/apple</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Gizmodo posts tagged 'apple']]></description>
			
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Stair Dismount iPhone Game Hands On (Verdict: Sadistic Fun)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/stairtop.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_stairtop.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411988/stair-dismount-gloriously-tumbles-onto-the-iphone-soon">Stair Dismount iPhone game</a> sent me back eight years to the time when I would waste hours sending the stickman tumbling down instead of working on my programming assignments. The iPhone game is that, with slightly better controls.</p>
<p>Its basic premise remains unchanged: select a part of a body, an angle, and then a level of power that you want to shove him down the stairs with. By varying the three, you get different types of tumbles, with the final goal being to hit as many parts of his person on the ground as hard as possible.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/stairs2.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_stairs2.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>If you're sadistic and enjoy seeing ragdolls get hurt, this is the game for you. The injury process is made all the more fun by the added Facebook Connect feature Secret Exit put in. You can only choose your friend's default profile photo, which eliminates a lot of your friends that don't just use their faces, but still gets you fun results, as seen in the screenshots above.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5412224,3,'');
</script></p>
<p>Basically, you already know if you're the kind of person who would enjoy the game. Either you laugh at people getting hurt, or you don't. And Secret Exit tells me that, depending on sales of this game, they'll consider releasing Truck Dismount (the followup to <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #stairdismount" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/stairdismount/">Stair Dismount</a>). That's undoubtedly just a ploy to get more sales, but this game is good enough as is to warrant a purchase.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412226/stair-dismount-iphone-game-hands-on-verdict-sadistic-fun]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412226]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hands on]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hands-on]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone games]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stair dismount]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stair dismount iphone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412226&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Best Gadgets]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/best-gadgets2009.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_best-gadgets2009.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>"What gadget should I get?" is a timeless question. To answer it, here's our leaderboard of favorite gadgets, from smartphones, laptops and cameras to vacuums, rechargeable batteries and earphones.</p>

<p><em>Last updated Nov 25th, 2009 but we'll update this list as the new stuff replaces the old and crusty. We read and write reviews so you don't have to!</em></p>
<h1>Smartphones</h1>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_smartphoooones.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<b>&bull; The Best Smartphones:</b> We like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5293388/iphone-3gs-review">iPhone</a>, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">Motorola Droid</a> because it runs Android 2.0 operating system, and the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5277499/palm-pre-review">Palm Pre</a> for people who have stuck with Sprint. We do not like anything Symbian or <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5374876/windows-mobile-65-review-theres-no-excuse-for-this">Windows Mobile 6.5</a>, for the time being. (But are excited for Windows Mobile 7.)</p>
<p><b>&bull; Cheapest Android Phones:</b> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5401220/droid-eris-review">Droid Eris</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5318860/htc-hero-review-ambitious-but-tragically-flawed">HTC Hero</a>.</p>
<p><b>&bull; The Best Smartphones, By Carrier:</b> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411351/the-best-smartphones-on-every-carrier/gallery/">We sorted out theses answers</a> on Nov 24th, but this category moves quickly so stay sharp when researching.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Best Windows Mobile Phone We Wish Didn't Run Windows Mobile 6.5:</b> The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5400593/htc-touch-hd2-review-a-tragedy">HTC HD2</a></p>
<p><b>&bull; Best BlackBerry:</b> If you're into phones with exceedingly reliable push email, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397391/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird">Bold 9700</a> is your phone. (We don't like Blackberry's touchscreen interfaces, so the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5393132/blackberry-storm-2-review-improving-but-still-mostly-cloudy">Storms</a> are no good.)</p>
<p><strong>&bull; Non-Smartphones:</strong> You mean dumbphones? <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5279250/dumb-cellphones-must-die">No thank you</a>.</p>
<h1>Computers</h1>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_velocity_guts-full_800.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<b>&bull; Netbook:</b> If you must get one of these small, cheap and utterly slow machines, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5359449/hp-mini-311-comes-original-with-nvidia-ion-transistor-graphics-powah-for-400">HP Mini 311</a> with ion graphics is a good one.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Netbook for Hackintoshing:</b> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5389166/how-to-hackintosh-a-dell-mini-10v-into-the-ultimate-snow-leopard-netbook">Dell Mini 10v</a> (and it must be the v) is the top choice. Here's our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5389166/how-to-hackintosh-a-dell-mini-10v-into-the-ultimate-snow-leopard-netbook">guide to making it run OS X</a>.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Laptop:</b> Our bias for <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346418/snow-leopard-review-lightened-and-enlightened">OS X</a> and <a href="hhttp://gizmodo.com/5330609/windows-7-review-you-can-quit-complaining-now">Windows 7</a> becomes apparent in our choice of hardware that can run both without hacking. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5287179/macbook-pro-2009-review">Macbook Pros</a>. (Plus, we like unibody construction.)</p>
<p><b>&bull; Best Non-Apple Laptops:</b> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397393/dell-adamo-xps-hands-on-insanely-thin-and-just-insane">Dell's Adamo XPS</a> may not be fast but it is "insane," raising the bar on design and quality outside of Cupertino. We also like Thinkpads in general, like the X series and the new <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5359096/lenovo-thinkpad-t400s-with-multitouch-review-finger-flicking-fun">multitouch t400s</a>. (It's probably also worth noting that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5406415/laptop-reliability-study-asus-and-toshiba-come-out-on-top">Asus and Toshiba</a> recently came out on top in reliability.)</p>
<p><b>&bull; Gaming Laptops and Desktops:</b> Our friend Will Smith at Maximum PC likes <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411525/the-four-gaming-pcs-worth-lusting-after?skyline=true&s=x">these two laptops and two desktops</a>. I personally like Xbox.</p>
<p><b>&bull; All in One:</b> We like the iMac, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5380088/hp-touchsmart-600-review-multitouch-multimedia-mogul">HP Touchsmart</a> and although we haven't used it yet, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5376704/sony-vaio-l-all+in+one-the-high+def-living-room-touchscreen-pc">Sony Vaio L</a> because it can double as a TV even when the PC is off. The PCs here have infrared touchscreens, so they do multitouch, but in a really shoddy way.</p>
<p><b>&bull; MIDs:</b> We hate MIDs. Always have, always will. Intel said they had the tech to make them; but the world never had the need. It either fits in a backpack and lets you do real work on a real screen and keyboard, or it fits in your pocket. There's no real need for anything inbetween.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Operating Systems:</b> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5330609/windows-7-review-you-can-quit-complaining-now">Windows 7</a> or <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5346418/snow-leopard-review-lightened-and-enlightened">Snow Leopard</a></p>
<p><b>&bull; Network attached storage:</b> We like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5387088/hp-mediasmart-ex495-windows-home-server-review-better-time-machine-support">HP Mediasmart series</a> with upnp, iTunes and Time Machine servers among other things. But the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388904/iomega-ix2+200-nas-review-it-does-all-this">Iomega NAS</a> is only a little less fancy and costs half the price.</p>
<h1>Audio</h1>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_ysp4000b_front.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<b>&bull; The Best receiver under $1000:</b> We haven't tested one in awhile, but we're going to go out on a limb and say we like Onkyo, Denon, Yamaha and Pioneer gear. While some of our own testing is in progress, we'll go with what our friends at Sound and Vision like: The <a href="http://www.soundandvisionmag.com/receivers/3016/onkyo-tx-sr706-av-receiver.html">Onkyo TX-SR706 7.1 receiver with 4HDMI ports and THX certification for $900</a>.</p>
<p><b>&bull; The Best High-End Portable Media Players:</b> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5360126/zune-hd-review-the-pmp-evolved">Zune HD</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/300127/apple-ipod-touch-review-verdict-good-in-the-face-of-greatness">the iPod Touch. We Like the</a> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5093831/zune-pass-subscription-service-adds-ten-free-keeper-tracks-a-month">Zune pass</a> system a lot, which allows you to keep 10 songs a month out of your unlimited downloads, even after you stop subscribing. But the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/300127/apple-ipod-touch-review-verdict-good-in-the-face-of-greatness">iPod Touch</a>'s large app library makes it a powerful little computer.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Best high-capacity media player:</b> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5355697/ipod-classic-gets-more-storage-shuffle-gets-colors-and-a-special-edition">iPod classic</a> is pretty much the only one left, since Zune has been discontinued and Archos is a mess.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Flash Media Drives:</b> We've always loved the screenless shuffle's utility, but there are other drives to be had with more functionality for cheaper. Especially now that the buttonless iPod shuffle is sort of annoying to use. We like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5349272/sandisk-sansa-clip%252B-mp3-player-keeps-the-bizarre-slotradio-dream-alive">Sandisk Sansa Clip+</a>.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Surround Soundbar:</b> There's only one series of soundbars that uses cold war submarine tech to bounce soundwaves off your walls for surround, and they're made by Yamaha. I tested the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/feature/ears+on-yamahas-flagship-ysp+4000-surround-sound-bar-verdict-ultra+discrete-sound-beams-298305.php">YSP-4000</a>.</p>
<p><b>&bull; iPod Speaker Dock:</b> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5211025/ipod-dock-8+way-battlemodo">JBL OnStage 400p</a> (A winner from last year &mdash; I'm almost certain we should be retesting this category)</p>
<h1>Video</h1>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_pana_50x1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<b>&bull; Best HDTV under $1000:</b> Panasonic's X1 series plasmas, and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5412450/the-five-best-hdtv-deals-under-1000">four more here</a>.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Best HDTVs, period:</b> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5409025/the-5-best-tvs-you-can-buy">Here</a>.</p>
<p><b>&bull; 1080p Projectors Under $1000:</b> The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381731/1000-1080p-projector-battlemodo-optoma-hd20-vs-vivitek-h1080fd">Vivitek H1080FD</a> is one we like, although we have not tested many.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Best Monitors:</b> If your'e a Mac user, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5063215/apples-new-24+inch-led-cinema-display-with-isight-is-899">24-inch Cinema Display</a> has a built in magsafe adapter. The Asus 23-inch <a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/lcd-monitors/asus-vh236h/4505-3174_7-33615002.html">VH236H</a> is good deal at about $230, but Samsung and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/dell%20monitors/bydate/?timerange=all">Dell</a> are our solid choices for monitor brands, as well.</p>
<p><b>&bull; The Best Pocket Projectors:</b> There is no such thing, friend. Wait a generation or 3.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Blu-ray player:</b> The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5255151/lg-bd390-wi+fi-blu+ray-player-review-so-packed-youll-forget-about-blu">LG BD390</a> with WiFi with Netflix and DivX playback is awesome, but we'll never leave out the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/370116/coming-blu+ray-20-update-makes-ps3-best-player-ever">PS3</a>!</p>
<p><b>&bull; Media Streamers for People Who Hate iTunes or Love Piracy:</b> The WDTV Live is a good one for people who like it easy, but hackers will probably choose Popcorn Hour, both which did well in our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397986/hd-media-player-battlemodo-apple-tv-killers">battlemodo</a>. (Stay tuned, cuz that $99 Asus O!Play may soon be the champ.)</p>
<h1>Cameras</h1>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_7dbody__087.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<b>&bull; Best Entry-Level Video-Capable DSLR:</b> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5234607/canon-rebel-t1i-vs-nikon-d5000-entry+level-dslr-battlemodo">Canon T1i</a></p>
<p><b>&bull; Best Midrange DSLR:</b> The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5042209/nikon-d90-official-first-dslr-ever-with-hd-video-recording">Nikon D90</a> has the same sensor as the D300 at a better price.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Best Prosumer DSLRs:</b> The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5400595/canon-7d-review">Canon 7D</a> is great at shooting video and has great low light performance for an 18MP camera.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Best Flash Camcorder:</b> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5401862/ultimate-pocket-camcorder-comparison?skyline=true&s=x">The Flip Ultra HD</a>.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Best Quality Point and Shoot:</b> We like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5389028/canon-g11-review-makes-you-feel-like-a-real-photographer-almost">Canon G11</a> (which is pretty big, but pretty wonderful.)</p>
<p><b>&bull; A Camcorder We Like:</b> We haven't tested any in awhile, but we tend to like DSLRs that shoot video or cheap flash camcorders. If you must have a camcorder, our friends at CamcorderInfo liked the <a href="http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Camcorderinfo-com-Select-Awards-2009-37268.htm#">Panasonic HDC-TM300 for ~$1000</a>.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Best Point and Shoot:</b> We like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5393112/canon-s90-review-itll-never-leave-my-pocket-except-when-im-taking-pictures">Canon S90</a>, even though we're sure there are slimmer cameras. This uses the same sensor as the G11 and a faster lens, so it takes great shots for a slim.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Best Rugged Cameras:</b> The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5336015/pentax-w80-camera-review-waterproof-and-now-slightly-ruggedized">Pentax W80</a> is the best all around camera because of it's depth and temperature ratings and size. The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5352296/panasonic-lumix-dmc+ts1-waterproof-camera-review-my-favorite-so-far-oddly">Lumix</a> has the best picture quality but is a bit of a wimp with low thresholds for dives and temperatures. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5342210/canon-powershot-d10-waterproof-camera-review-dive-dive-dive">Canon</a>'s the best for water only because of its huge nose. And the outstandingly rugged <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5354083/olympus-stylus-tough-8000-waterproof-camera-review-the-one-that-says-bad-motherfcker-on-it">Olympus</a> has a fatal flaw, which is its terrible video.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Best Helmet Camera:</b> We love the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5181155/gopro-hero-wide-sports-camera-lightning-review">GoPro Hero HD Wide</a> because it mounts anywhere, is really waterproof and lives in a protected case. Plus, 1080p for $250 bucks.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Best Slow Motion Pocket Camera:</b> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5169120/casio-exilim-ex+fc100-slow+mo-pocket-cam-lightning-review">Casio EX FC100</a></p>
<h1>Random Stuff</h1>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_corsairflashvoyager128_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<b>&bull; The Best iPhone Apps:</b> Here's our <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-apps-directory/">monthly list of iPhone Apps</a>, as well as our weekly roundups of the best new releases.</p>
<p><b>&bull; The Best iPhone GPS Apps:</b> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5374147/motionx-gps-drive-review-hands-down-the-best-value-in-gps-apps">Motion X GPS</a> is our favorite value GPS app, but ALK's CoPilot is another <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5367026/iphone-navigation-app-battlemodo-part-ii-the-best-cheap-gps-app">cheap champ</a>. Navigon is still the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5343981/the-best-iphone-navigation-app-telenav-vs-navigon-vs-tomtom">classiest</a>, but it costs a lot. (We're hoping for free <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5391408/google-maps-navigation-a-free-ass+kicking-turn+by+turn-mobile-app">Google Maps with Navigation</a> to come to iPhone.)</p>
<p><b>&bull; The Best Android Apps:</b> There aren't as many <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/pst/androidapps/">Android apps</a> out, but here are the ones we think are worth checking out.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Ebook reader:</b> Until we review a Nook, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5163042/kindle-2-review-sheeeyah-more-like-kindle-15">Kindle 2</a> is still king.</p>
<p><b>&bull; USB drive:</b> The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5254582/whats-the-best-usb-flash-drive">Patriot Xporter</a> is fast, but if you have cash to spare, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5393180/corsair-flash-voyager-128gb-usb-drive-as-big-and-fast-as-a-small-fish">Corsair Voyager GT</a> is slightly faster and has 128GB of space.</p>
<p><b>&bull; The Best Video Game Console:</b> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/search/xbox/bydate/?timerange=all">Xbox 360</a></p>
<p><b>&bull; The Best Video Service:</b> Anything, really, combined with Hulu and Netflix (for free old stuff).</p>
<p><b>&bull; Best mid-tier office chairs:</b> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5286694/herman-miller-setu-chair-is-a-poor-mans-embody">Herrman Miller Setu</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5326809/steelcase-cobi-designer-puts-your-design-skills-where-your-ass-is/gallery/">Steelcase Cobi</a>.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Vacuums:</b> We will always be loyal to Sir James Dyson because he tried to sell bagless vacuum tech to big vacuum corporations and they shut him down motivated by the profitability of bag sales. Then he started his own company. His machines are loud, but you can't argue with their industrial design. Here's his <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5349616/review-dual-wielding-dyson-d31s">latest handheld</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5254811/dysons-dc28-animal-looks-feels-sounds-powerful">ball vacuum</a>.</p>
<p><strong>&bull; Routers:</strong> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5344355/d+link-dir+685-wireless-storage-photo-frame-router-review">D-Link Dir685</a>. I know it has a digital picture frame built into it, but it also has a HDD and a bittorrent client. And Jason says it's been more reliable than the top line Linksys he tested it against. I also like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5170096/apple-time-capsule-review">Time Capsule</a>, but haven't yet tested the one with 2x the wireless performance.</p>
<p><b>&bull; The Best Headphones:</b> For <a href="http://i.gizmodo.com/5033455/ultimate-cut+the+crap-in+ear-headphone-battlemodo">in ear buds</a>, we like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5191218/shure-se115-in+ear-headphones-review-the-new-top-buds">Shure SE110/SE115</a>, Ultimate Ears Metro.fi and Etymotics hf5 won our tests. (The Last updated August 2008, so look for updates to winners.) We like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5338482/klipsch-image-s4i-review">Klipsch Image S4i</a> earbuds for people who want to use the iPhone's voice control or iPod shuffle's Voiceover function. For <a hef="http://gizmodo.com/5369490/bluetooth-headphone-battlemodo-the-best-isnt-the-best">Bluetooth stereo headsets</a>, we like the Motorola s305.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Rechargeable Batteries:</b> <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5152116/battlemodo-energizer-vs-duracell-rechargeable-batteries">Duracell destroyed Energizer</a>, and kept up with the legendary Sanyo Enerloops.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Mice:</b> For gaming, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5209312/razer-mamba-vs-sidewinder-x8-wireless-gaming-mice-review">Microsoft Sidewinder X8</a>. The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5040312/logitech-mx-1100-mouse-review-verdict-our-favorite-mouse-ever">Logictech MX1100 for regular mousing</a>. And the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386202/apple-magic-mouse-review">Magic Mouse</a> is not amazing, but it's pretty good if you have a Mac&mdash;the best mouse Apple has ever made.</p>
<p><b>&bull; Keyboard:</b> We like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5037145/lightning-review-logitech-dinovo-edge-keyboard-mac-edition">Logitech DiNovo</a>.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://digg.com/api/diggthis.php?u=http://digg.com/gadgets/10_Second_Cheat_Sheet_The_Best_Gadgets_Right_Now" align="right" frameborder="0" height="82" scrolling="no" width="55"></iframe></p>
<p><em>Suggestions? Requests for review? Leave em in the comments or email us!</em></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411442/the-best-gadgets]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411442]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[bestmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hdtvs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipods]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nas]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pcs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the best gadgets]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Lam]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411442&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Windows 7 Passes Mac OS X Install Base]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It was going to happen eventually, since Windows has 18 times <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #osx" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #osx" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/osx/">OS X</a>'s marketshare, but <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #windows7" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/windows7/">Windows 7</a> already passed Apple's install base about a month after having been released. Again, not a surprise, but it is interesting how many people already upgraded to Windows 7 (or bought a new machine with Windows 7 on it). [<a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9141424/Windows_7_passes_Mac_OS_X_in_market_share_race">Computerworld</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412987/windows-7-passes-mac-os-x-install-base]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412987]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[snow leopard]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows 7 marketshare]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 14:59:32 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412987&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Every Mac Price-Compared Across Retailers]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/appledeals.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_appledeals.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>AppleInsider has a ridiculously handy chart that compares prices on Mac sales across various retailers. Granted, it's not taking into account Apple's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackfriday" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackfriday/">Black Friday</a> deals, but there are hundreds of dollars to be saved if you're interested. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/11/25/apple_authorized_resellers_launch_black_friday_sales_early.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412869/every-mac-price+compared-across-retailers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412869]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple black friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[black friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac mini]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:59:59 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412869&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gifts for Apple Cultists Who've Grown Beyond Shame]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>If you're reading this, there's at least a 50 percent chance you or someone you know is a complete Mactard. Here's their wish list (SPOILER: It's all Apple stuff):</p>
<p>BTW, if you hate the gallery format as much as the Grinch hated Christmas, click <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411982/gifts-for-diehard-mactards/">here</a>.</p>

<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_mouse5.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #magicmouse" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/magicmouse/">Magic Mouse</a>:</strong> It's a bit too expensive for stocking stuffer territory, but we've called the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5385892/so-long-nipples-this-time-you-wont-be-missed">nipple-less</a> design the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386202/apple-magic-mouse-review">best mouse</a> Apple has ever made. And if you can't appreciate touch-sensitive scrolling, you have no soul (or, at least not one that we can see). <b>$70</b> [<a href="http://store.apple.com/us/go/product/MB829?aid=AIC-WWW-NAUS-K2-BUYNOW-MAGICMOUSE-INDEX">Apple</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_hellboybuffy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Buffy Gelaskins:</strong> Loving Apple will only half-fill one's necessary geek quotient. Your loved one will do well filling the other half with Buffy, now that Dark Horse comics has teamed up with Gelaskins re-stickable case skins for the iPhone and MacBooks. <b>$15 iPhone, $30 MacBook</b>. [<a href="http://www.darkhorse.com/Search/Browse/GelaSkins/PpwNwkt8">Dark Horse</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_apple_imac_27inch.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>iMac (27-inch i7):</strong> You simply won't find a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5388567/apple-imac-review-27-inches-and-less-chin">more striking desktop</a> on the market, but maybe more importantly, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5407204/benchmarked-the-quad+core-i7-imac-is-super-fast">benchmarks</a> on Apple latest top-tier iMac are <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411073/why-its-gotten-straight-stupid-to-buy-a-mac-pro">currently challenging</a> far more expensive Mac Pros. Plus, the line has just seen a refresh, so it's a good time to buy. <b>$2200+</b> [<a href="http://www.apple.com/imac/">Apple</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_picture_2_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>BookArc Stand:</strong> No, it's not the gift for everyone. But if you know a guy who just docks his MacBook anyway, the BookArc Stand is a far more elegant solution than sitting a laptop on a desk (especially since the laptop should run cooler given the increased surface area for airflow). [<a href="http://www.twelvesouth.com/products/bookarc/">BookArc</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_apple-tshirt.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Doesn't Fall Far From the Tree (T-Shirt):</strong> Who says the apple doesn't fall far from the tree? This t-shirt, that's who. $18. [<a href="http://www.goapeshirts.com/products/019/">Go Ape Shirts</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_ioutab_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Apple Tablet IOU:</strong> Apple fanboys love Apple's products. But true Apple fanboys&mdash;those who take commitment and fanaticism to the next level&mdash;could never be pleased with what Apple currently has on the table. They need the Next Big Thing. <a href="gizmodo.com/t/apple-tablet">We're about 1000% certain</a> that Apple will release a tablet some time in 2010. Promise your loved ones that you'll camp overnight and drop the cash so they get the Apple Tablet first. Of course, they'll still bitch about it, anticipating version 2.0. <strong>Price Unknown, Costs Some Dignity</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_dbmbp.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>DON'T BUY <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macbookpro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macbookpro/">MacBook Pro</a>:</strong> There has simply never been a worse time to buy a new MacBook Pro. With Core i5/i7 tech inevitably waiting to make its way into Apple's premium laptops, your hard-earned cash will almost certainly buy a vastly more powerful, more future-proof machine less than a month after Christmas. The same can probably be said about Mac Pros, too. Oh, and that 27-inch iMac we keep raving about? What a glorious alternative to the aging, 30-inch Apple Cinema Display! [<strike><a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/">Apple</a></strike>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_wallofsoundnew.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><strong>Wall of Sound iPod Dock:</strong> There are iPod docks, and there are iPod docks. This is most definitely the latter, a handcrafted, 3x4-foot, 225lb, 125W beast. And one day, when Apple inevitably tweaks the iPod port, this behemoth will be useless&mdash;feeding into the general regret and dissatisfaction critical to Apple fandom. [<a href="http://www.thewosexperience.com/">Wall of Sound</a>]</p>
<p><i>Don't forget to recommend your own favorite Apple gear in comments-include pics and pricing if possible.</i></p>
<p><i><a href="http://gizmodo.com/t/giftguide2009">All Giz Wants</a> is our annual round-up of favorite gift ideas, including amazing attainable objects and a few far-out fantasies. We'll be popping guides catered to different interests several times per day for the next week, so keep checking back.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411982/gifts-for-apple-cultists-whove-grown-beyond-shame/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411982]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[gift guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple gift guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gelaskins]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gift Guide 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giftguide2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[magic mouse]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 11:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411982&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ColorWare's Kaleidoscope of Color Comes to 27-inch iMacs and the Magic Mouse]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/colorware-imac.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_colorware-imac.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Hot the heels of letting you <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5358777/the-ps3-slim-painted-just-like-i-like-it">paint the PS3 Slim</a>, ColorWare will now also customize your latest Apple gear. For $500, you can colorize your own iMac, or pay a $700 premium (over Apple's prices) to buy one from ColorWare.</p>
<p>They're also painting the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #magicmouse" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/magicmouse/">Magic Mouse</a> now, too. It'll cost you $100 to buy one through them ($30 premium), or $30 bucks to send your own in. Considering how <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5386202/apple-magic-mouse-review">easy it is to scuff</a> the damn thing, a shiny new coat of paint might be what the doctor ordered for Mac-heads with OCD. [<a href="http://www.colorwarepc.com/c-3-computers.aspx">ColorWare</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_colorware-magicmouse.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412600/colorwares-kaleidoscope-of-color-comes-to-27+inch-imacs-and-the-magic-mouse]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412600]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[27-inch imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ColorWare iMac Magic Mouse]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core i5 imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Custom Paint Job]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[magic mouse]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Wed, 25 Nov 2009 08:44:59 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny Allen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412600&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Don't Miss Objectified on PBS Tonight]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/t0fe800C2CU&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/t0fe800C2CU&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object>We've shown you <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5399420/watch-jonathan-ives-segment-in-objectified">Jonathan Ive's</a> segment in <i>Objectified</i> before, but the whole movie is on PBS later tonight. Check out <a href="http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/objectified/index.html">PBS</a> for the schedule and watch the fantastic Ives clip once more while you wait. [<a href="http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/objectified/index.html">PBS</a> via <a href="http://twitter.com/Gartenberg/status/6022510790">Michael Gartenberg</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5412267/dont-miss-objectified-on-pbs-tonight]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5412267]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[designers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jonathan ive]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[objectified]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[videos]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:14:15 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5412267&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Stair Dismount Gloriously Tumbles Onto the iPhone Soon]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tAeTxPINttw&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tAeTxPINttw&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object> <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #stairdismount" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/stairdismount/">Stair Dismount</a> for the iPhone is a spiritual descendant of the Stair Dismount Porrasturvat game back in 2001/2002 where you try your hardest to launch a ragdoll as painfully as possible down a flight of stairs. It was brilliant.</p>
<p>The current iPhone version (not out yet, but supposedly will be by Thanksgiving) has a larger number of stairs and stair types, but seems to be a little slower in rendering the "falling" animation than its PC ancestor&mdash;probably because the emulator is running as well as the recording software. It still has the delicious crunching sound and wiggly ragdoll physics, which means we'll still be first in line to get this for our iPhones. [<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tAeTxPINttw">YouTube</a> via <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2009/11/23/sneak-peak-stair-dismount-offers-broken-bones-mostly/">TUAW</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411988/stair-dismount-gloriously-tumbles-onto-the-iphone-soon]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411988]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[games]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gaming]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone games]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stair dismount]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[stair dismount iphone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 13:49:08 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Chen]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411988&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone Translation App Speaks Three Languages With Your Mouth]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/ilingual_02.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_ilingual_02.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Somewhere on the App Store spectrum, between the travel phrasebooks and those apps that replace your mouth with a slightly weirder mouth, you'll find iLingual, an app that steals your lips, and uses them to speak three different languages.</p>
<p>Here's how it works: you snap a picture of a mouth&mdash;yours, your girlfriend's, or just a photo from a magazine&mdash;which iLingual then analyzes and converts for animation. Then, you choose a phrase from the app's 400-strong library, hold your iPhone over your mouth and <em>there</em>, you sort speak French, German or a little bit of Arabic, with a disconcertingly segmented, animated pair of lips. <em>Félicitations!</em><br>
<object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/oA5CMtQDyP4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/oA5CMtQDyP4&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><br>
This really shouldn't be more useful than a standard prerecorded phrasebook, but it definitely <em>is</em>. Nobody likes tourists, and the genius of iLingual is that by using it, you're making fun of yourself; you're giving people something&mdash;a small amount of your dignity, or if you're lucky, a laugh&mdash;in exchange for their help. iLingual is a sponsored app, so it's completely free. [<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/artist/emirates/id331907534">iTunes</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411875/iphone-translation-app-speaks-three-languages-with-your-mouth]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411875]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[emirates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ilingual]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone translations app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mouths]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[translation]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:19:12 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411875&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Best Smartphones on Every Carrier]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/smartphoooones.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_smartphoooones.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>For the first time ever, every major carrier in the US actually has smartphones worth buying, meaning you don't have to break up to get a good phone. Here's the best phones on each one, along with the best deals.</p>

<p>If you hate the gallery format, click <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411351/the-best-smartphones-on-every-carrier/">here</a>.</p>
<p><em>All pricing shown is with a new 2-year contract, and some deals may be temporary.</em></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/topshot2.jpg" width="804" height="565"></p>
<h1>AT&T</h1>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphone3gs" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone3gs/">iPhone 3GS</a></strong><br>
The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5293388/iphone-3gs-review">iPhone 3GS</a> is the best overall smartphone you can buy. It's really that simple. Best user interface, best internet, best apps, best media support&mdash;the list goes on. Okay, not the best network, but nothing's perfect. <a href="http://www.wireless.att.com/cell-phone-service/packages/packages-details.jsp?q_package=sku3790236&amp;_requestid=120494">$199</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbold9700__088.jpg" width="804" height="537"><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberrybold9700" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberrybold9700/">BlackBerry Bold 9700</a></strong><br>
I miss the original BlackBerry Bold's king-sized keyboard, but <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397391/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird">the Bold 9700</a> squeezes the best of the BlackBerry for CEOs into an impressively tight form factor&mdash;faux leather back included&mdash;making it very possibly the best BlackBerry you can buy. <a href="http://walmart.letstalk.com/product/product.htm?prId=35946">$10</a></p>
<p><strong>Bonus: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #nokiae71x" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/nokiae71x/">Nokia e71x</a></strong><br>
It's free, and an actually good smartphone&mdash;my favorite Nokia phone on the planet. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Nokia-E71x-Phone-Black-AT/dp/B0027A7XWE/ref=amb_link_84232451_4?pf_rd_m=ATVPDKIKX0DER&pf_rd_s=auto-sparkle&pf_rd_r=03BG5E6P2DMXF74VG9M6&pf_rd_t=301&pf_rd_p=475996731&pf_rd_i=e71x">Free</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/drooooooid__002.jpg" width="804" height="536"></p>
<h1>Verizon</h1>
<p><strong>Droid</strong><br>
It's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">a terminator</a>. A huge, disgustingly high-res screen, Batman-worthy industrial design, and the full power <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395801/android-20-review-almost-human">of Android 2.0</a> make it the best phone on Verizon&mdash;and the fact that it's running on arguably the best network in the US make it the second best smartphone you can buy, period. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Motorola-Droid-A855-Verizon-Wireless/dp/B002UUTCKC/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=wireless&qid=1259070645&sr=1-2">$150</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/bbtour.jpg" width="504" height="482"><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackberrytour" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackberrytour/">BlackBerry Tour</a></strong><br>
Sure, it's notorious for trackball problems and it's missing Wi-Fi, but this is the BlackBerry of choice for email warriors if they're not on AT&T or T-Mobile&mdash;and it sure as hell beats anything running Windows Mobile. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/BlackBerry-Tour-Phone-Verizon-Wireless/dp/B002GJTS3I/ref=sr_1_13?ie=UTF8&s=wireless&qid=1259070717&sr=8-13">$50</a></p>
<p><strong>Bonus: <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #droideris" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/droideris/">Droid Eris</a></strong><br>
If you're desperate to save $100 over the Droid, the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5401220/droid-eris-review">Droid Eris</a> will run Android 2.0 soon enough, and is smoother, smaller, and friendlier, if a little blander. <a href="http://www.verizonwireless.com/b2c/store/controller?item=phoneFirst&action=viewPhoneDetail&selectedPhoneId=5070">$100</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/bodysmall.jpg" width="504" height="399"></p>
<h1>Sprint</h1>
<p><strong><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #palmpre" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/palmpre/">Palm Pre</a></strong><br>
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5277499/palm-pre-review">The Pre</a> offers one of the best user experiences of any smartphone with Palm's webOS, and it's probably the best phone on Sprint, hardware build issues and comparatively dinky App Catalog aside. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Palm-Pre-100-Phone-Sprint/dp/B002JIO4JY/ref=sr_1_4?ie=UTF8&s=wireless&qid=1259070251&sr=8-4">$80</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/DSC_1100.jpg" width="1024" height="683"><strong>HTC Hero</strong><br>
The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5361245/sprint-hero-review-faster-stronger-uglier">best Android phone</a> not running Android 2.0, HTC's Sense UI makes the sometimes confusing Android interface more digestible and has a few nifty tricks of its own, like integrated social networking. <a href="http://wireless.bestbuy.com/specialoffer.aspx?cid=34308_a5abbe52b26b4c05afe33717acc0697f">$100</a></p>
<p><strong>Bonus</strong>: There is none. <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5406001/palm-pixi-review">The Pixi's</a> close (<a href="http://wsf0-walmart.letstalk.com/product/product.htm?prId=35990">$25</a>), but the fact that you can get the Pre for nearly as cheap undercuts a lot of the value, as much as we like the design and form factor.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/thescreen.jpg" width="800" height="533"></p>
<h1>T-Mobile</h1>
<p><strong>Motorola Cliq</strong><br>
<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381995/motorola-cliq-review">Motorola's other Android phone</a> is gussied up with Blur, a custom interface that's bright and friendly, with widgets for keeping track of everything happening on your social network. It's our favorite Android phone on T-Mobile. <a href="http://wsf0-walmart.letstalk.com/product/product.htm?prId=35848">$100</a></p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/06/IMG_4739.jpg" width="804" height="536"><strong>Unlocked iPhone</strong><br>
No, I'm not kidding. A <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5302123/jailbreak-and-unlock-iphone-30/gallery/">jailbroken and unlocked</a> iPhone, even without 3G powers, is the second best smartphone you can use on T-Mobile.</p>
<p><strong>Bonus: BlackBerry <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #bold9700" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/bold9700/">Bold 9700</a></strong><br>
The <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5397391/blackberry-bold-9700-impressions-small-and-chirpy-like-a-black-hummingbird">BlackBerry Bold 9700 is</a> the first BlackBerry with 3G on T-Mobile, which is reason enough, really, but it's good the reasons listed above, too. <a href="http://wsf0-walmart.letstalk.com/product/product.htm?prId=35982">$130</a></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411351/the-best-smartphones-on-every-carrier/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411351]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[at&t]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blackberry tour]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bold 9700]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cliq]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[droid eris]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[e71x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gift guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Gift Guide 2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[htc]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone 3gs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[nokia e71x]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[palm pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pixi]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pre]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tour]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411351&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[BassJump Brings MacBooks a Bit of Bump]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_bassjump.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />BassJump is, quite simply, a dedicated subwoofer to compliment your MacBook&mdash;in both aesthetics and sound.</p>

<p>Rather than merely plugging in through USB, the BassJump uses proprietary software to remix all audio coming out of your laptop, essentially treating those tinny integrated speakers as tweeters while the BassJump handles the lows.</p>
<p>I can't believe that this solution works better than simply plugging in a whole new 2.1 speaker system, but I must admit, the Mac Mini styling coaxes my fanboyism to at least give the idea a shot. $80 and available now. <script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5411738,8,'');
</script>[<a href="http://twelvesouth.com/products/bassjump/">BassJump</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411734/bassjump-brings-macbooks-a-bit-of-bump]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411734]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[speakers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bass jump]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bassjump]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[twelve south]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:09:11 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411734&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Jerry Seinfeld Upgrades Classic Mac with iMac]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/seinfeld_imac.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_seinfeld_imac.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Sadly, <a href="http://obsoletethebook.tumblr.com/">obsolete gadgets</a> have to be replaced. Happily, change is good. This is what happened to <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #jerryseinfeld" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/jerryseinfeld/">Jerry Seinfeld</a>'s ever-present <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5269088/what-to-do-with-an-original-1984-macintosh">classic Macintosh</a> which, after all these years, has been replaced by a new iMac.</p>
<p>It happened in the "Seinfeld reunion" episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm. The iMac seems to be from the previous generation, not the 16:9 model. Jerry's classic Mac was only replaced once before, during the last season, with an Apple Macintosh 20th Anniversary.</p>
<p>It wasn't the only wink to the Cupertino company during that episode, but it certainly was the most significant sign of time change.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/jerry-seinfeld-curb-enthusiasm-macbook-pro-bare.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_jerry-seinfeld-curb-enthusiasm-macbook-pro-bare.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>I wonder if Jerry's iMac actually <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5045703/the-first-bill-gates-%252B-jerry-seinfeld-microsoft-ad-makes-no-sense">runs Windows</a> (and that sound you heard was the scream of the million Apple fanboys reading these lines). I know. I'm a cruel man. [<a href="http://macenstein.com/default/2009/11/microsoft-pitch-man-seinfeld-upgrades-to-an-imac/">Macenstein</a> and <a href="http://www.edibleapple.com/jerry-seinfeld-is-still-an-apple-fan-at-heart/">Edible Apple</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411729/jerry-seinfeld-upgrades-classic-mac-with-imac]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411729]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bill gates]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jerry seinfeld]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macintosh]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:59:44 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411729&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Some Core i7 iMacs Showing Up Dead]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_500x_apple_imac_27inch.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />There's some grumbling going on in forums and other blogs about Core i7 iMacs showing up DOA much more often than you'd expect from a brand-new computer.</p>
<p>The two types of issues we're seeing most are cracks in the screen and a completely dead computer on delivery. What's most plausible is that the packaging just wasn't designed to handle the size and weight of the giant 27-inch iMac as it gets tossed around the cab of a FedEx truck. Apple has so far been extremely responsive and effective in making repairs and exchanges, but it's still a discomfiting sign&mdash;if you're about to buy a new iMac, you might want to wait and see if Apple announces a fix for whatever's going on before you take the plunge. [<a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2235367&start=0&tstart=0">Apple</a> <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=10620546%EF%BF%BD">Forums</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/24/core-i7-imacs-showing-up-doa-including-ours/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411547/some-core-i7-imacs-showing-up-dead]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411547]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core i7 imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[core i7 imac doa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[cracks]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[doa]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:42:29 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411547&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - Stuff We Didn't Post (and Why)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #philschiller" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/philschiller/">Phil Schiller</a> Talks App Approval, Avoids Saying Much of Anything...Microsoft Reiterates Smackdown on Pirate Xbox Users...iPhone Magnification Camera Mod Came From the Recycle Bin...Another Anonymous Netbook/Sleeping Aid Hits Wireless Carrier...</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/1120_philip_schiller.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Phil Schiller Talks App Approval, Avoids Saying Much of Anything</h2>
<p>There are lots of legitimate concerns about Apple's app approval (app!) policy, and in a recent profile in Business Week, Senior VP Phil Schiller goes out of his way to not respond to any of them. Yes, we understand that there are legitimate reasons for having an extensive approval process, and we even appreciate the complication-free results. But Schiller neglected to respond to any of the real problems with the process, like, say, the Google Voice ban. We're always interested to hear an Apple higher-up discuss the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appstore" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/appstore/">App Store</a>, but we prefer it when something's actually said. [<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2009/tc20091120_354597.htm">Business Week</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/custom_1258890556169_thor.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Microsoft Reiterates Smackdown on Pirate Xbox Users</h2>
<p>In response to Microsoft's mass banning of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #xboxlive" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/xboxlive/">Xbox Live</a> users with pirate leanings, said pirates are contemplating hitting them with a class-action lawsuit&mdash;but Microsoft doesn't seem even a little bit scared. MS's response:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Piracy is illegal and modifying an Xbox 360 is a violation of the Xbox Live Terms of Use. Microsoft is well within its legal rights to ban these users from Xbox Live.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Translation: Hey, you guys down there, you piratey types? Cute lawsuit and all, but you ain't got a chance in hell of winning this.</p>
<p>This winds up in Remainders because the lawsuit is still, as of now, speculative&mdash;no such suit has actually been filed. Still, that's about as big an ice burn as you're likely to see from the big MS. [<a href="http://kotaku.com/5410196/microsoft-responds-to-class-action-claim-against-xbox-live-bannings">Kotaku</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/screen-shot-2009-11-23-at-4.57.17-pm.png" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>iPhone Magnification Camera Mod Came From the Recycle Bin</h2>
<p>Bummed about the iPhone's lack of zoom? Bummed enough to attach the lid from a pickle jar to the back of your iPhone? Here's a tutorial for how to create a multi-zoom add-on with items found in your recycle bin and a few lenses pried off deceased cameras. It's ungainly as hell, and I'm not totally sure the iPhone's camera is good enough to be worth such effort ugliness, but it does seem like it would work and it even has an external flash. And, of course, we've seen much <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5077150/iphone-unnecessarily-hacked-to-add-real-keyboard">dumber mods before</a>. [<a href="http://www.instructables.com/id/S2NCAEIG1BBBZG1/">Instructables</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/iphone-camera-mod-for-magnification-because-you-can/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/lg_x120-130109.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Another Anonymous Netbook/Sleeping Aid Hits Wireless Carrier</h2>
<p>Another day, another netbook. AT&T brings the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #lgx120" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/lgx120/">LG X120</a> 10.1-incher Stateside to be sold, subsidized of course, through Radioshack.com and the obviously so much more hip brick and mortar version, The Shack. It'll be sold for $180 with a 2-year contract, which requires a $60 per month data charge. As far as specs, it's got a 160GB hard drive, 1GB memory, a 1.6GHz Atom and Windows XP, and in case of emergency will function as a sleeping aid so potent you might never wake up. What I'm saying is, it's in Remainders because seriously you guys, snore. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/23/lg-x120-netbook-comes-to-the-us-with-2-year-atandt-contract/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411508/remainders-+-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411508]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lg x120]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[phil schiller]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[xbox live]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411508&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[According to Apple It's Your Own Fault if You Catch an iPhone Worm]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_mehappleresponse.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />We've told you <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5400153/first-iphone-worm-discovered-rickrolls-jailbroken-iphones">over</a> and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5395645/dutch-hacker-holds-jailbroken-iphones-hostage-for-5-ransom-while-exposing-security-vulnerability">over again</a> that you need to secure your jailbroken iPhone. If you still haven't listened and were affected by the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5410732/new-jailbroken-iphone-worm-wants-your-bank-details">latest iPhone worm</a> then it is kinda your own fault. Even Apple thinks so.</p>
<p>Aside from blaming the victims, I don't exactly entirely agree with Apple's statement. It's not the actual jailbreaking that exposed iPhones to these ridiculous worms, it's simply the fact that a lot of people install and enable SSH without changing the default root password. If you don't miss that important step, a jailbreak could almost be considered an improvement. After all, it allows you to use Google Voice, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411304/the-iphone-already-has-multitasking-and-its-awesome">multitasking interfaces</a>, and a bunch of <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphone-apps-directory?p=3">apps</a> otherwise unavailable. So don't let the big A scare you. Just practice safe jailbreaking, kids. That's all.</p>
<p>PS: If you still don't know how to protect yourself from this silliness, it's easy: Go into Cydia, install the MobileTerminal app, and use the passwd command to change the default from "alpine", to something that won't leave you in need of a de-worming. [<a href="http://www.loopinsight.com/2009/11/23/apple-responds-to-reports-of-new-iphone-worm/">Loop Insight</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411377/according-to-apple-its-your-own-fault-if-you-catch-an-iphone-worm]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411377]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jailbreaking]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa Golijan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411377&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[This Is How Multitasking Should Work On the iPhone]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/multitask.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />In 2009, <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #iphonemultitasking" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/iphonemultitasking/">iPhone multitasking</a> is a bit like apps were in the early jailbreak days. That is to say painfully, <em>clearly</em> possible, but simply not allowed. These jailbreak apps show how it could&mdash;and should&mdash;be done.</p>

<p>What you're seeing here is really the combination of two apps, standby jailbreak justifier and <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5394321/jailbreak-backgrounder">essential iPhone app</a> Backgrounder, which lets your designate any app to run in the background, and new task switcher interface called Multifl0w. (There are other, more basic task switchers already, the most widespread being Kirikae) The new combo feels like magic: It's a little bit Android, a lotta bit Pre, and more importantly, an obvious improvement, at least on the speedier 3GS.<br>
<object id="" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YrGLGoB88So&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed name="" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YrGLGoB88So&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></embed></object><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/yrglgob88so.jpg" class="left image340" width="340"  style="display: none;"/><br>
Granted, anyone who's used background knows that for the sake of your battery, you have to be careful how many apps you open, and how many you leave running. Honestly though? Every other smartphone manufacturer trusts their users to <em>mind their own damn processes</em>, which seems to work out pretty well. So, uh, when will we get this by default? OS 4.0? 5.0? Shut up, blogger?</p>
<p>You can give it a try now in jailbreak app manager Rock, and Cydia's on its way. Sadly, it's only free on a trial basis, after which it'll cost your five dollars. Backgrounder and Kirikae, though? They're still free, in all sense of the word. [<a href="http://multifl0w.com">MultiFl0w</a>-<em>-Thanks, William!</em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411304/this-is-how-multitasking-should-work-on-the-iphone]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411304]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[btw]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone multitasking]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[jailbreak]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[multifl0w]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[multiflow]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:24:15 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411304&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[iPhone and Android Are Taking Over the (Mobile) Internet]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/smartphoneshareusoct.png" class="left image340" width="340" />So, what does it take to snatch a combined 75% of US mobile internet traffic? Two operating systems, a handful of phones, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5271098/every-mobile-browser-should-give-up-and-just-go-webkit">and one great browser core</a>.<br clear="all"></p>

<p>That the iPhone is a massive source of online traffic isn't a surprise&mdash;that's been apparent since the week it launched. What's interesting here is Android's rise, which is dramatically quickening, already accounting for a <em>fifth</em> of mobile traffic in the US, when the real marketing push for the OS, starting with the MyTouch ads and the massive Droid launch, is only recently starting in earnest. What is a surprise, or at the very least a Sad Thing, is how poorly Palm is faring. Their tiny sliver of market share might seem understandable since they really only had one new phone for the duration of the survey, but this phone was supposed to be their savior; in the year since it was introduced, their mobile traffic actually <em>fell</em>.<br>
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/smartphonesharewwoct.png" class="left image340" width="340" />Google and Apple's stark gain in the stats, collected by mobile advertising firm <a href="http://metrics.admob.com/2009/11/october-2009-mobile-metrics-report/">AdMob</a>, is a little less spectacular worldwide, mainly because Symbian's established, but waning, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5404274/2009-the-year-apple-and-rim-ate-everyone-elses-lunch">40% smartphone market share</a> helps it snatch about 25% of mobile web traffic. Still though, two things are clear: Android and the iPhone are who mobile web developers are going to have to cater to, and WebKit, which Symbian uses in its browser too, is basically <em>it.</em><br clear="all"></p>
<p>Anyway, how about a bonus chart! Ever wondered how common the different Android handsets are, which is most popular, and which don't register? Well hello, extra pie: <img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/android-distribution-nov-18.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /><br>
<br clear="all">
The G1 is the predictable star here, but the Droid is <em>exploding</em>. [<a href="http://metrics.admob.com/2009/11/october-2009-mobile-metrics-report/">AdMob</a> via <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/23/apple-and-android-now-make-up-75-percent-of-u-s-mobile-web-traffic/">Techcrunch</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411253/iphone-and-android-are-taking-over-the-mobile-internet]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411253]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[smartphones]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[android]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[charts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile browsing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[symbian]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:31:30 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411253&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Why It's Gotten Straight Stupid to Buy a Mac Pro]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/imacmacpro.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_imacmacpro.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Never before has it been so apparent that a power tower&mdash;pretty much the laziest design in the computer industry&mdash;is being sold by a design-centric company with neither design nor power.</p>

<p>And I'm not sure that the solution is just a refresh away.</p>
<p>The <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #macpro" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/macpro/">Mac Pro</a> was once the only viable option for a OS X lover in need of serious horsepower for tasks like editing media. Now, with the new iMac? I think it's straight up stupid to buy a Mac Pro.</p>
<p>The $2,500 Mac Pro, desperately in need of a refresh, gives you a 2.66GHz Quad-Core Xeon (essentially an i7), 3GB of RAM (triple channel, but seriously?), 640GB hard drive (again, seriously?) and a nominal graphics card. Spend $800 more and you'll get a another processor and 3GB more RAM.</p>
<p>The $2200, 27-inch iMac obviously includes a screen, plus you get a 2.8GHz Quad-Core (i7), 1TB drive, 4GB of RAM and a nominal graphics card.</p>
<p>But beyond those clock speeds, the Mac Pro's i7 processor is the more premium Bloomfield edition, while the iMac uses the Lynnfield. (More on those differences <a href="http://tech.icrontic.com/articles/making-sense-of-lynnfield-is-bloomfield-really-better">here</a>.)</p>
<p>Still, the bottom line is that the iMac's Lynnfield processor is newer, and it shows in performance.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.macworld.com/article/143970/2009/11/core15_imac.html">Macworld benched</a> the new iMacs against the latest Mac Pros. And, you know what? The i7 iMac more than held its own. It basically defeated the 4-core Mac Pro <em>across the board</em>.</p>
<p>And other than a few specific tasks in which the most expensive Mac Pro's 8 cores proved beneficial (Handbrake, Cinebench, etc), the iMac outperformed the competition or kept things close enough not to be relevant, plus it straight-up won in the eyes of Speedmark 6.</p>
<p>Performance-wise, the base Mac Pro makes no sense at all. The 8-core Mac Pro offers a touch more power, sometimes, and other times (in many day to day tasks) even it is outgunned.</p>
<p>Of course, any Mac Pro still allows multiple internal hard drives, three PCI slots, more FireWire ports (four vs one) and more room for RAM expansion (32GB vs 16GB). But once again, even in the worlds of professional media creation, that's a pretty questionable upsell, especially with external storage solutions and the fact that most high, high end media pros (like special effects artists) turn to dedicated render farms to do their heavy number crunching anyway.</p>
<p>With the new iMac, Apple has shrunk the Mac-Pro-needing niche even smaller. And I can't tell anyone with a straight face that a handful of expandability is worth $300-$1100 with no monitor, no matter how deep their pockets are.</p>
<p>Apple needs to reexamine their pricing model. Even with an inevitable processor refresh (<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5411119/intel-core-i9-benched-six-cores-of-pure-joy">i9</a>, anyone?), it's time for a price drop and/or some free with purchase displays. Just because you're a pro doesn't mean you're a sucker.</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5411073/why-its-gotten-straight-stupid-to-buy-a-mac-pro]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5411073]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rant]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[imac]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mac pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[top]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5411073&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[AViiQ Aluminium Laptop Stand Review]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_7693a.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_7693a.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>AViiQ is a new company that makes just one product: a portable, aluminum laptop stand that supports systems up to 17 inches while folding up like an accordion.</p>

<h1>The Price</h1>
<p>$80 on pre-order now.</p>
<h1>The Verdict</h1>
<p>I like it both more and less than I expected to.</p>
<p>On one hand, AViiQ's portable laptop stand matches my MacBook while angling my keyboard at a truly perfect 12 degrees. And it folds, with relative ease, down to an absurdly thin, near-weightless strip of aluminum that can squeeze into any bag, I'm certain.<br>
<a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/img_7691a.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_7691a.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>On the other, the stand feels cheaper than I'd expect for its $80 price. Sure, we're talking about aluminum, but more like flimsy, pop can aluminum than unibody Mac aluminum. And it folds through a plastic connective tissue that loosens over time but never feels 100% in terms of general structural integrity.<br>
<script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5410985,4,'');
</script><br>
For $20, the investment would be a no-brainer. For $80...well, it's a bit more complicated. Do what you will depending on your particular socioeconomic status.</p>
<p><br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Super light<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Crazy-thin<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizplus3_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> Excellent ergonomics<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> I can't help but worry about long-term durability<br>
<br clear="all">
<img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gizminus_04.jpg" width="20" height="20"> $80</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE: This, from AViiQ:</strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p>"The product IS very light so it may seem less substantial, but in this case, it's a purposeful part of the design to make the product ultralight for easy travel. Alcan, the developer of Hylite, says that the hinges can be folded more than 5000 times without any wear. As for the price tag, like titanium or carbon fiber, lightweight often equals more expensive and Hylite certainly adheres to that truth. We tried making it out of a material that was lightweight and inexpensive, but feathers just don't have the structural strength we required (not to mention the sneezing it caused in the studio)."</p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5410981/aviiq-aluminium-laptop-stand-review]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5410981]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[AViiQ]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[AViiQ review]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[laptop stands]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5410981&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[More Rumored Apple Black Friday Deals]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/applebf.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_applebf.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Round two of Apple's <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #blackfriday" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/blackfriday/">Black Friday</a> deals, and <a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/11/23/apples-black-friday-brochure-leaked-one-more-time/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheBoyGeniusReport+%28Boy+Genius+Report%29">this set</a> looks way more like the real thing&mdash;meaning they're less <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5406115/apple-black-friday-possibly-leaked-i-really-want-it-to-be-true">outrageously awesome</a>, but there's still some good stuff inside.</p>
<p>&bull; $100 off MacBook Pros<br>
&bull; $100 off iMacs<br>
&bull; $20 off iPod touches<br>
&bull; $20 off iPod nanos<br>
&bull; $20 off Apple TV</p>
<p>And assorted other minor cuts on accessories like AirPort routers, wireless keyboards and the Magic Mouse. I was hoping for a better deal on a Time Capsule, personally. Supposedly, these deals are for the online store only, not the brick & mortar locations, so there's more to come. [<a href="http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2009/11/23/apples-black-friday-brochure-leaked-one-more-time/">BGR</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5410905/more-rumored-apple-black-friday-deals]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5410905]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[unconfirmed]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple black friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[black friday]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dealzmodo]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:46:04 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[matt buchanan]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5410905&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Dumb iPhone That Thinks It's a MacBook]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/q300-ultra-1.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_q300-ultra-1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I know I've said that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5279250/dumb-cellphones-must-die">dumb cellphones must die</a>, but what about a dumb cellphone called iPhone that looks like a white MacBook? Yeah, smash those too.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5410895,3,'1990s iPhone Clone');
</script></p>
<p>This 2.2-inch clamshell aberration&mdash;technically the <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appleq300ultra" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/appleq300ultra/">Apple Q300 Ultra</a>&mdash;costs around $70, which is $70 too much. [<a href="http://www.shanzai.com/index.php/bandit-gadgets/phones/447-if-apple-had-designed-an-iphone-in-1999">Shanzai</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5410903/the-dumb-iphone-that-thinks-its-a-macbook]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5410903]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple Q300 Ultra]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:45:43 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5410903&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Three-iPhone Ocarina Much More Expensive Than No-iPhone Ocarina]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/iphoneocarina.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_iphoneocarina.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Do you have three iPhones kicking around that you aren't using? If so, you could make an insanely expensive ocarina out of them using some laser-cut plastic. But the real question is why you would do such a thing. [<a href="http://blog.makezine.com/archive/2009/11/mystery_iphone_musical_instrument.html">Make</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5410865/three+iphone-ocarina-much-more-expensive-than-no+iphone-ocarina]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5410865]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[instruments]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ocarina]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:10:36 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5410865&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Apple Inbox]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/12938_1254338752793_1059283927_778194_4798237_n.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />If I had a mailbox like this, I would have a huge dog and call him Spamkiller. [Thanks Eduardo Lozano]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5410733/the-apple-inbox]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5410733]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[image cache]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple powermac g4]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mailbox]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[powermac]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:49:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5410733&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Here We Go Again: Camera Equipped iPod Touch This Spring?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/ipodtouch-camera.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Just when you thought you could forget about the elusive bugger, rumors about an iPod Touch with a built-in camera start up again. The latest report points to a Spring 2010 refresh that will finally include a video camera.</p>
<p>The latest rumor reads like it's August all over again, but it does have one particularly disappointing aspect. According to the source, the iPod touch camera will match the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5401862/ultimate-pocket-camcorder-comparison">not-so-hot quality</a> of the nano's.</p>
<p>Here's to hoping the engineers can somehow stuff the iPhone's camera into an iPod Touch. Sure, there's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5355753/why-there-is-no-camera-in-the-ipod-touch-and-why-that-sucks">not much space</a> to work with in the Touch. And Apple releases iPods in fall, not spring, but we can <i>believe</i>. [<a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-11295-LA-Gadgets-Examiner%7Ey2009m11d20-Apple-to-release-iPod-Touch-with-camera-this-Spring">The Examiner</a> via <a href="http://www.9to5mac.com/ipod_touch_camera_for_spring_30099">9 to 5 Mac</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5410013/here-we-go-again-camera-equipped-ipod-touch-this-spring]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5410013]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipodtouch]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipodtouchcamera]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipodtouchvideo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[rumors]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5410013&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Denying Support to Smokers?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_apple_smokers.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />The Consumerist is reporting that two Mac users were denied AppleCare coverage because the owners were smokers. Not because the computers were damaged by second hand smoke, but because of OSHA regulations.</p>
<p>According to separate reports, Apple denied coverage for two users in 2008 based on the fact that OSHA lists cigarette smoke as a biohazard. Both techs refused service to the computers not because the smoke damaged them, but because it's considered hazardous to a tech's health to work on a contaminated unit.</p>
<p>Both owners tried to appeal their cases, even going all the way up to Steve Jobs. Unlike <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5408729/steve-jobs-responds-to-passionate-app-developer-curtly">this guy</a>, they weren't as lucky.</p>
<p>These are just two isolated incidents though, and in the comments at Consumerist some smokers are reporting having no trouble getting Apple to service their computers. It appears to be on a case-by-case basis, not a hard-set policy. Any smokers out there ever run into trouble getting Apple to repair hardware? [<a href="http://consumerist.com/5408885/smoking-near-apple-computers-creates-biohazard-voids-warranty">Consumerist</a> via <a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/story/09/11/21/147253/Apple-Voiding-Smokers-Warranties">Slashdot</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409976/apple-denying-support-to-smokers]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409976]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[applecare]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[repair]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[smokers]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409976&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Magic Mouse Drivers for Windows Now Available]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/10/newmousenew.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_newmousenew.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #magicmouse" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/magicmouse/">Magic Mouse</a> owners lusting for multi-finger gestures on a PC can stop wishing. Some good ol' fashioned hackery pulled Windows drivers from the latest Bootcamp update. You can grab them <a href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2009/11/14588/">here</a>, report back with results. [<a href="http://uneasysilence.com/archive/2009/11/14588/">Uneasy Silence</a>, <em>thanks Dan!</em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409942/magic-mouse-drivers-for-windows-now-available]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409942]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[drivers]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[magic mouse]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[windows]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409942&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Wired for the Apple Tablet]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/BLc-8gT2eKg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BLc-8gT2eKg&hl=en&fs=1&fmt=22" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="308" class="left gawkerVideo"></object>We still don't know what the fabled <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #appletablet" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/appletablet/">Apple Tablet</a> actually looks like, or if it even exists, really, but this concept magazine reader from Condé Nast gives us a glimpse at what to expect from tablet apps.</p>
<p>Turn down your volume before hitting play, loud techno music awaits. Down? OK, good. Now let's look at what we've got here. It's about what you would expect from a tablet magazine reader. The big screen lets you soak in the magazine layout without zooming, and the graphics are big and interactive. In a nutshell, it looks like a hi-res iPhone app.</p>
<p>According to the source, Condé Nast doesn't want to take any chances, and the app is a precautionary measure to make sure they're ready if/when the device comes out. So don't take this to mean that launch is imminent. Take it as a sign that even if the tablet doesn't exist, it should, because a lot of huge publishing companies are more than willing to throw their weight behind it. [<a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/11/itablet/">Wired</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409871/wired-for-the-apple-tablet]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409871]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[apple tablet]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple tablet app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[conde nast]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[magazine]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:30:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Jacob]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409871&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - Stuff We Didn't Post (and Why)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Apple Patent Describes iPod UI "Pushed" to Other Devices...Philips Announces Very Pretty Pro LCD Line...NYTimes Columnist Proposes Boycott of "Pro-Communist China" Bing...Ooma Adds New Handsets and International Plan...</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/110925-gui_pushing_accessory_500.png" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Apple Patent Describes iPod UI "Pushed" to Other Devices</h2>
<p>An Apple patent filed in May 2008 describes a way of pushing whatever UI Apple wants to non-Apple hardware, for consistency's sake. That non-Apple hardware could include car stereos or something like the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5403517/chumby-one-review-totally-frivolous-but-totally-adorable">Chumby One</a> (which has iPod functionality, but with a lookalike UI). It's a nice idea for Apple, but could be tricky given the myriad different hardware that might want to take advantage. What if the hardware has a resistive touchscreen, or a shitty processor? Might it just be better to use a custom interface for iPod integration? Regardless, it's in Remainders because it's not really that unexpected or interesting in its implications. [<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2009/11/19/apple-researching-methods-for-pushing-user-interfaces-to-accessories-from-media-devices/">MacRumors</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/philipsledpronovember09.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Philips Announces Very Pretty Pro LCD Line</h2>
<p>Philips' new high-end LCD line looks pretty fantastic, with two important caveats. First, let's drool a little: The two models (40- and 46-inch) have a 5,000,000:1 contrast ratio, 1ms response time, 5 HDMI ports (not sure why you'd need that many, but whatever) and a 200Hz refresh rate, with a nice brushed-aluminum look. Now, the caveats. First, they're UK only, and second, they're prohibitively expensive at about $3,000 and $4,100, respectively. Still, drool-worthy. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/20/philips-launches-9704-led-pro-televisions-in-the-uk/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/051201_tiananmen-square_ex.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>NYTimes Columnist Proposes Boycott of "Pro-Communist China" Bing</h2>
<p>NY Times columnist Nicholas Kristof has proposed a boycott of Microsoft's Bing search engine due to its supposed pro-Chinese-government censorship of search terms like "Dalai Lama" and "Tienanmen" when searched in simplified Chinese characters. In English and other non-Chinese languages, the results you'd expect from "Tienanmen" show up, but in Chinese, apparently it returns sanitized results (no massacre, in that case). Since I'm not really sure how to type simplified Chinese characters on an all-Amurrican MacBook Pro keyboard, I haven't tested it myself&mdash;but if true, it's a little underhanded on Microsoft's part, although certainly paling in comparison to, you know, the Chinese government. What's odd is that Google's Chinese search also returns censored results, but "to a much lesser extent," so I guess it's okay. Weird stuff. [<a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2009/11/nyts_kristof_calls_for_bing_boycott.html">TechFlash</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/oomatelo-lg.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Ooma Adds New Handsets and International Plan</h2>
<p>Internet phone company Ooma began shipping its new Telo handset as well as offering a very cheap international calling plan (500 minutes for $5 per month). Ooma, for those who don't know (I assume this includes everyone) varies from other VoIP services like Vonage by cutting out the monthly fees, instead packing them into a fairly expensive set-top box, at $250. So this international plan requiring a monthly fee is a big deal for them, but it winds up in Remainders because I honestly had not even heard of Ooma until this morning. Oops. [<a href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/09/11/20/ooma.telo.adds.handsets.international.plan/">Electronista</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409786/remainders-+-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409786]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[lcd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ooma]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[patents]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[philips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[pro]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voip]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409786&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[PSA: Applebee's Gift Card Are Not Redeemable on iTunes]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_applebees.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />To whom it may concern: Applebee's gift cards, while appropriately monolithic, are not redeemable at Apple Stores or on iTunes. [<em>Thanks Nicholas!</em>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409366/psa-applebees-gift-card-are-not-redeemable-on-itunes]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409366]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[applebee's]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409366&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Flo TV Shown Off On The iPhone For Reasons Unknown]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/p1060779-copy.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_p1060779-copy.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>I get that this <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375872/qualcomm-flo-tv-personal-television-hands-on-250-to-shut-up-the-kids">Flo TV</a> iPhone demo is just a proof of concept. That's fine! I'm just a little confused as to what the concept is.</p>

<p>Is it just what they're showing us? A <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #flotv" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/flotv/">Flo TV</a> app, that requires some kind of accessory to tune into broadcasts? That's possible, but given how well the iPhone can stream video over 3G, it'd be a hard sell, even with Flo TV's <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5375872/qualcomm-flo-tv-personal-television-hands-on-250-to-shut-up-the-kids">cable-like channel selection</a>. It would also help if said accessory wasn't larger than the actual iPhone.</p>
<p>Or is it to foster excitement over the idea of native Flo TV hardware support in the iPhone, like in the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/htc-imagio">HTC Imagio</a>? Because that will never, ever happen. So again, <em>why</em>? [<a href="http://www.electricpig.co.uk/2009/11/19/flo-tv-for-iphone-demoed/">Electric Pig</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409415/flo-tv-shown-off-on-the-iphone-for-reasons-unknown]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409415]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[flo tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone flo tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[mobile tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[qualcomm]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[tv]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:32:19 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409415&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sometimes, Dreams Come True]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><script type="text/javascript">
newVideoPlayer("/gizmodo-voices.flv", 500, 375,"");
</script>In 2007 I whined and whined <a href="http://gizmodo.com/267899/no-iphone-sdk-means-no-killer-iphone-apps">asking for an iPhone Software Developer's Kit</a>. Back then, <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/wishlist/what-iphone-thirdparty-apps-would-you-like-264784.php">I asked for five apps</a>. It took two years, but today I've got them all. The last one just came in yesterday.</p>
<p>It's not Voice Candy, but <i>Voices</i> looks as good, if not better: Retro tape recorder and microphone, cute icons, simple touch interface, and sharing via Twitter, Facebook, and eMail, so you can spook everyone with that infernal Reverse Voice effect. For $1, it's impossible to resist.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5409221,5,'Voices Gallery');
</script></p>
<p>[<a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/voices-fun-voice-morphing/id337447139?mt=8">iTunes App Store</a>&mdash;Thanks Juanlu and <a href="http://twitter.com/mostlylisa">Lisa Bettany</a>, who stars in the Voices' promo video]</p>
<p>Now that I think about it, most of the apps <a href="http://gizmodo.com/gadgets/wishlist/what-iphone-thirdparty-apps-would-you-like-264784.php">I pasted</a> in this graphic are now in the iPhone in one form or another.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/runiphonerun.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_runiphonerun.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Are you still missing a favorite?</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409228/sometimes-dreams-come-true]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409228]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Apple iphone SDK]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[clips]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone app]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Voice processor]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[voices]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:40:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409228&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[The Future of Apple, According to Its Biggest Fans]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Also known as <em>the entire technology press</em> amirite? Ha? In all seriousness though&mdash;Maclife asked various bloggers, journalists and tech personalities what their dream Apple products would be, and mocked them all up in detailed renders. Here's what happened:</p>

<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/1119_iread_open_622_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_1119_iread_open_622_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #veronicabelmont" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/veronicabelmont/">Veronica Belmont</a>, of Tekzilla/Mahalo/BOL fame/general video on the internet fame, sees Apple finally going ahead with that <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381011/microsoft-couriers-swipes-snips-and-scribbles-the-leaked-interface">Courier concept</a> Microsoft keeps dragging their feet on. Or, Apple subsumes Microsoft entirely. <em>What do you know, Belmont?</em></p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/1119_imake_622_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_1119_imake_622_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>BoingBoing's/MAKE's Mark Frauenfelder goes as DIY-y as is humanly possible, and projects a future in which Apple is just a bunch of dudes with Arduinos and a pair of pliers. You see, we'll just buy Apple's designs, and your iMake object printer will print them out.</p>
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/1119_itenna_down_622_01.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_1119_itenna_down_622_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a><a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #brianlam" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/brianlam/">Brian Lam</a>, <a href="http://twitter.com/blam/">Man With Hat</a>, just wants his iPhone to get reception in San Francisco, for once. Hence, bunny ears.</p>
<p>There are a couple more, and they're all in the same whimsical, not-quite-serious vein. Check them out at [<a href="http://www.maclife.com/article/feature/apple_their_eyes">Maclife</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409254/the-future-of-apple-according-to-its-biggest-fans]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409254]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[concepts]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[brian lam]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[renders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[veronica belmont]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:46:31 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Herrman]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409254&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple vs Microsoft Wars Pit Shareholders Against Steve Ballmer]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_ms-bad-image-quote.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />This year's Microsoft shareholder meeting wasn't a lot of fun for Microsoft CEO <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #steveballmer" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/steveballmer/">Steve Ballmer</a> and Chairman Bill Gates, thanks to shareholders grilling him about Apple and the iPhone with questions like the above. Ballmer smacked him right back:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>There's certainly always opportunities for improvement. There is a group of people with whom our market share is less. You take any country, including this one, and you say, how are we doing? The truth of the matter is, we do quite well. Even among college students, we do quite well. Do we have an opportunity for improvement? We do. Some of that is marketing some of that is phase of life.</p>
<p>It is important to remember that 96 times out of 100 worldwide, people choose a PC with Windows, that's a good thing. Even in the toughest market, which would be the high end of the consumer market here in the U.S., 83 times out of 100 people choose a Windows PC over a Mac.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gatesballmer09shareholders_01.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" />Ballmer also remarked that Apple has gained a few "couple of tenths of a percent of market share," but when the audience chuckled, he was prompt to say correct them:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Every couple of tenths matter. They matter when we're increasing our Bing market share, too.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Ooooooh, you are good, Mr Ballmer, you are <i>good</i>. There were many other piercing questions about the iPhone, Android. Check them out at [<a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2009/11/shareholders_quiz_ballmer_about_macs_windows_mobile_phones.html">Techflash</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5409192/apple-vs-microsoft-wars-pit-shareholders-against-steve-ballmer]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5409192]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft vs apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve ballmer]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus Diaz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5409192&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Intel Atom's Snow Leopard Compatibility Re-Hacked]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The 10.6.2 update for Snow Leopard didn't include Atom chipset support, so it wouldn't work on hackintoshes&mdash;but didn't keep enterprising hackers from finding a workaround. They promised it <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5402228/netbook-hackintosh-1062-fix-coming-in-a-few-weeks-fallen-netbooks-can-be-revived-now">last week</a>, and now they've delivered: Atom support is back, although apparently implementing the fix isn't the easiest project. Still, the ball's in Apple's court now. Is this going to turn into a Palm Pre-iTunes thing, or will Apple just let it lie? [<a href="http://tech.yahoo.com/news/macworld/20091119/tc_macworld/hackbrings1062backtoatomprocessors">Yahoo</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408918/intel-atoms-snow-leopard-compatibility-re+hacked]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408918]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[hackintosh]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple atom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[atom]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408918&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Remainders - Stuff We Didn't Post (and Why)]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>Trade in Your DVDs, Plus a Couple Bucks, and Get the Blu-ray Versions...<a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #steveballmer" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/steveballmer/">Steve Ballmer</a> Acknowledges Apple's Gains, Remains Cocky...Sanyo to Build Houses Powered by Solar Energy and Li-Ion Batteries...Sony Announces Vague "iTunes-Like" Store on <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #playstationnetwork" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/playstationnetwork/">PlayStation Network</a> for Books, Movies, Music...</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/dvd2b_newsletter03a.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Trade in Your DVDs, Plus a Couple Bucks, and Get the Blu-ray Versions</h2>
<p>Warner set up a DVD to Blu-ray exchange program called, appropriately enough, DVD2Blu, as sort of a more-tempting version of its HD-DVD to Blu-ray version. The problem is, it's not actually that great of a deal; you're limited to Warner movies, obviously, but it also costs $8-10 per DVD, plus $5 shipping, for the exchange. You might actually be better off just hitting Best Buy or Walmart or whatever and looking for sales, since DVD2Blu could cost you 18 bucks plus the agony of waiting for your new HD copy of <em>The Wedding Singer: Totally Awesome Edition</em> to arrive. [<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/19/warners-dvd2blu-trade-in-swaps-blu-rays-for-your-dvds-leland-g/">Engadget</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/gatesballmer09shareholders.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Steve Ballmer Acknowledges Apple's Gains, Remains Cocky</h2>
<p>Microsoft held a shareholder's meeting this morning, led by the always-dynamic Steve Ballmer, and an interesting question came up: Why does Microsoft have such a lousy reputation among certain demographics, like, say, upper-middle-class college kids? Ballmer admitted that Apple's been seeing some gains that, while small, are a clear sign that Microsoft has room for improvement, either in marketing or product positioning. It's a pretty clear-headed statement from Ballmer&mdash;after all, he notes, Microsoft still has an insane marketshare, even in the high-end consumer demo, so despite Apple's visibility, Microsoft doesn't exactly have cause for concern. That level-headedness is why this story's in Remainders: Where's the explosive, frothing-at-the-mouth, prone to Bidenesque gaffes Ballmer we all know and, um, know? [<a href="http://www.techflash.com/seattle/2009/11/shareholders_quiz_ballmer_about_macs_windows_mobile_phones.html">TechFlash</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/screen_shot_2009-11-19_at_9.03.21_pm.png" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Sanyo to Build Houses Powered by Solar Energy and Li-Ion Batteries</h2>
<p>Sanyo, considered Japan's "greenest" electronics manufacturer (sort of like being the best-dressed homeless person), is about to start building solar-powered, lithium-ion-based homes in its native country. The houses are all equipped with LED lighting, solar-powered water heater, all that stuff. They'll be a little pricey, at around $355,000&mdash;an equivalent non-green house would cost $62,000 less, although the Sanyo houses come with a $30,000 government subsidy. It's in Remainders because it's Japan only, and because I don't understand enough Japanese to learn any more about it. [<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/11/19/solar-energy-and-lithium-ion-batteries-sanyo-now-builds-green-homes-in-japan/">Crunchgear</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/3-10-09psn.jpg" class="left image340" width="340" /></p>
<h2>Sony Announces Vague "iTunes-Like" Store on PlayStation Network for Books, Movies, Music</h2>
<p>Sony announced the tentatively named <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #sonyonlineservice" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/sonyonlineservice/">Sony Online Service</a> today&mdash;it's described as an "iTunes-like" service on the PlayStation Network, offering movies, music, and books, all media for which Sony also sells accompanying hardware. It'll also allow users to upload their own video, and will probably have support for independent app development later on down the road. We don't really know much else, like, say, a launch date or pricing (or even a final name), so it winds up here, alone in the dark corner of Gizmodo we call Remainders. [<a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/11/19/sony_announces_itunes_competitor_for_music_movies_books.html">AppleInsider</a> via <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/11/19/sony-to-expand-playstation-network-into-sony-online-service-sel/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408923/remainders-+-stuff-we-didnt-post-and-why/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408923]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dvd]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[dvd2blu]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[gizmodo remainders]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[playstation network]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sanyo]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[Sony Online Service]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve ballmer]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[warner]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408923&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Gifts for Apple Haters]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p>There are loads of <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #applehaters" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/applehaters/">Apple haters</a> out there (even some among our commenters), and they deserve great tech gifts just as much as that guy who thinks all PMPs are called iPods. Here are some very un-Apple gift ideas.</p>
<p>BTW, if you hate the gallery format as much as the Grinch hated Christmas, click <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5408769/gifts-for-angry-rant+prone-apple-haters/">here</a>.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_img_9360.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<strong>Zune HD + ZunePass and HD Dock:</strong> If your Apple hater is in the market for a PMP, there's no better option than the <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5360126/zune-hd-review-the-pmp-evolved">Zune HD</a>&mdash;in terms of media capabilities, it kicks the iPod Touch's standard-def ass with HD radio, 720p video output, a killer OLED screen and a gorgeous, media-centric UI. It'll play any file your iPod can (that aren't iTunes protected), and can also handle video up to 720p. (iPods can't go there yet.) The ZunePass, which gives unlimited music downloads for $15 a month, is a killer supplement, and the HD dock, which outputs high-def video to TVs, is a must-have add-on. Put them together and you will bestow your Apple hater with bragging rights over those poor, deprived iPod owners. <strong>$290, $70 (dock), $15/month (ZunePass).</strong> [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5360126/zune-hd-review-the-pmp-evolved">Link</a>; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Zune-Video-MP3-Player-Platinum/dp/B002JPITY8">Zune HD</a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Zune-G7D-00001-HD-AV-Dock/dp/B002JPITYS">HD Dock</a>, <a href="http://www.zune.net/en-US/products/zunepass/default.htm">ZunePass</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_hptouchsmart600.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<strong>HP TouchSmart 600:</strong> The new iMac is nice and all, but try poking it in the face and see what happens. Here, I'll spoil it for you: Nothing. The HP TouchSmart 600 isn't perfect, but its multitouch media capabilities offer a wow factor no Mac desktop can boast. And that's what it is now&mdash;there's no telling what developers will do with Windows 7's integrated touch. Plus, it's comparatively cheaper, spec for spec, than the iMac, and you can get a Blu-ray drive built-in, with no philosophical kerfuffle from Apple about the future of digital media. You want to watch <em>Planet Earth</em> in HD on Blu-ray right now, dammit, and you shouldn't have to wait for the HD stream to trickle in. <strong>$1,110.</strong> [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5380088/hp-touchsmart-600-review-multitouch-multimedia-mogul">Link</a>; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/TouchSmart-600-1050-23-Inch-Desktop-Windows/dp/B002ONCDWY">Amazon</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_left_4_dead_2_review.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<strong>Whatever the Hot PC Game Is Right Now:</strong> I don't play videogames that don't feature Mario prominently, but even I know that anyone with a passing interest in computer gaming has to have a Windows PC. Apple haters will love a copy of <em>Dragon Age: Origins</em> or <em>Left 4 Dead 2</em> on PC, not just because they're great games (or so I hear&mdash;thanks Will!) but also because you can't play 'em on the Mac OS. <strong>$40 each.</strong> [<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Dragon-Age-Origins-Pc/dp/B001IK1BWC">Dragon Age: Origins</a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Left-4-Dead-2-Pc/dp/B002BRYXRQ">Left 4 Dead 2</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_droid_01.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<strong>Motorola Droid:</strong> Sure, Matt may have called the Droid "the second best smartphone you can buy," the best being the iPhone 3GS, but Apple haters will find plenty to love about the Droid&mdash;and plenty to loathe about the iPhone. I won't rehash our review (or Verizon's intimidating "Droid Does" ad campaign), but anybody who's into tech enough to hate Apple will really be into the distinctly un-Apple Droid. Multitasking, open-source, a ballsy industrial design, and a hardware keyboard: Droid's got it, iPhone doesn't. <strong>$200.</strong> [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5396168/motorola-droid-review">Link</a>; <a href="http://phones.verizonwireless.com/motorola/droid/#/home">Verizon</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_500x_mx1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<strong>Logitech Performance MX Mouse:</strong> I don't care if Apple's Magic Mouse is the best Apple mouse ever&mdash;in my opinion, one shared among Apple lovers and haters alike, Apple's mouse pedigree is nothing to be proud of. Style over ergonomics, awkward touch scrolling, high price&mdash;the Magic Mouse is an easy gadget to hate. The Logitech Performance MX isn't. Logitech crammed in an amazing new laser technology that even works on glass, it fits comfortably in the hand and has real buttons, dammit, like in the good old days. If you're not desperate for something to match your Mac, and certainly your Apple hater is not, the Logitech Performance MX is the right choice. <strong>$80.</strong> [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5340410/logitech-performance-anywhere-mouse-mx-review">Link</a>; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-910-001105-Performance-Mouse-MX/dp/B002HWRJBM">Amazon</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_acer.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<strong>Acer Aspire One:</strong> Apple doesn't think netbooks match up with their premium brand reputation, but the public doesn't care&mdash;netbooks are huge sellers, and the Acer Aspire One AOD250 is one of the most interesting yet. It dual-boots not one but two non-Apple OSes (Android and XP), offers a whopping nine hours of battery life, and its diminutive 10.1-inch size is just right for travel&mdash;perfect for somebody who wants to point out the gaping 8-to-12-inch hole in Apple's lineup. <strong>$330.</strong> [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5381868/acer-aspire-one-aod250-boots-android-and-win-xp-holds-us-over-until-chrome-os-arrives">Link</a>; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Acer-AOD250-1613-10-1-Inch-Black-Netbook/dp/B002P8M7BA/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1255427802&sr=8-1">Amazon</a>]</p>
<p>Note: In an earlier version of this post, I accidentally described a not-yet-released notebook from Asus, not this sweet little netbook. Sorry for the confusion.</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_girl_talk.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<strong>Tickets to a Girl Talk Show:</strong> Aside from putting on a damn fun show, mash-up artist <a href="http://www.myspace.com/girltalk">Girl Talk</a> (real name Gregg Gillis) is not only one of the most prominent electronic musicians working today but the only exclusive Windows user in that genre who comes to mind. Plus, a major part of his shows, since there's no, you know, band, or anything, is inviting the crowd up on stage in a sweaty, hipstery, dancey mass while he mixes music live on his PC&mdash;with Saran Wrap taped all over it, for protection against flying perspiration. Girl Talk proves that Apple doesn't have a monopoly on music production, and your Apple hater will have a great time to boot. <strong>$15-25.</strong> [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5080755/im-a-gross-sweaty-hipster-and-im-a-pc">Link</a>; <a href="http://www.myspace.com/girltalk">Girl Talk</a>, Image from <a href="http://www.pedestrian.tv/news/view/1574/girl-talk-is-a-pc.htm">Pedestrian.tv</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_don_tbuyenvy13.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /><br>
<strong>DON'T BUY HP Envy 13:</strong> But why not buy this well-reviewed, recently released, Windows-7-running laptop? I'll tell you why. The HP Envy 13 is a photocopy of a photocopy of the 13-inch MacBook Pro&mdash;same aluminum case, same black bezel around the screen, same chiclet keyboard with reversed Fn keys, same multitouch clicking trackpad. It's definitely not a bad laptop, and does have a few advantages over the MacBook Pro (like a better screen and crazy battery life) but it's also got weaknesses: No optical drive, for one, but also an unforgivably high price. The Envy 13 <em>starts</em> at $1700, $500 more than the MacBook Pro. Although if it were one day given the Hackintosh treatment, it would be the creepiest Mac clone ever, it's currently quite un-Hackintoshable (if that's a term). [<a href="http://gizmodo.com/5370592/hp-envy-13-review-the-macbook-imitated-not-duplicated">Link</a>; <a href="http://www.shopping.hp.com/webapp/shopping/computer_series.do?storeName=computer_store&category=notebooks&series_name=ENVY13_series&aoid=41841&srccode=cii_23393768&cpncode=20-31914480-2">HP</a>]</p>
<p><i>Don't forget to recommend your own favorite Apple-hating gifts in comments&mdash;include pics and pricing if possible.</i></p>
<p><i><a href="http://gizmodo.com/t/giftguide2009">All Giz Wants</a> is our annual round-up of favorite gift ideas, including amazing attainable objects and a few far-out fantasies. We'll be popping guides catered to different interests several times per day for the next week, so keep checking back.</i></p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408769/gifts-for-apple-haters/gallery/]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408769]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[giftguide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple haters]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple haters gift guide]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giftguide2009]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giftguideapple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[giftguideapplehaters]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Nosowitz]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408769&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Steve Jobs Responds to Passionate App Developer, Curtly]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_steveiphoneblockquote1.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Apple told <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #thelittleappfactory" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/thelittleappfactory/">The Little App Factory</a> to change the name of their popular app iPodRip, as it had the word iPod in it. The CEO sent a passionate letter to <a class="autolink" title="Click here to read more posts tagged #stevejobs" href="http://gizmodo.com/tag/stevejobs/">Steve Jobs</a>, and he got a response.</p>
<p>Here's the letter he sent:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Dear Mr. Jobs,</p>
<p>My name is John Devor and I'm the co-owner of a small Mac shareware company named The Little App Factory and a long-term Apple customer and shareholder. I doubt you're aware but we recently received a letter from a law firm working on Apple's behalf instructing us that we had violated several of Apple's trademarks in our application iPodRip and asking us to cease using the name and Apple trademarks in our icons.</p>
<p>We have been distributing iPodRip since 2003 with the aim of providing a method to recover music, movies and photos from iPods and iPhones in the event of a serious hardware failure on their Mac which leads to data loss. Our goal has been to provide the highest quality product coupled with the highest quality service in a bid to resolve some of the angst that is generated by such an ordeal; service befitting of an Apple product. In this department we think we have succeeded as we have approximately 6 million customers, many Apple employees, music artists and other notable people in society. In fact I'd argue that our customer service is the best of all competing applications in our niche as many of them are scams and frauds that leave Apple customers with a terrible taste in their collective mouths. We fear very much that tens of thousands of Apple customers looking to recover their own music and having heard of our product via word-of-mouth or otherwise, will instead find a product produced by one of our competitors, and will wind up the victim of a scam (one closely-named competitor charges a hidden monthly fee, for instance).</p>
<p>It is quite obvious that we mean Apple no harm with the use of the name iPodRip, or of the inclusion of trademarked items in our icons, and in fact I believe that we have been providing an excellent secondary service to Apple customers that has potentially caused you many repeat clients. In fact, we are quite aware that Apple support and store staff have recommended our software on numerous occasions as far back as 2004 so we have felt that we were doing something right!</p>
<p>With this in mind, we are in desperate need of some assistance and we beseech you to help us to protect our product and our shareware company, both of which we have put thousands upon thousands of hours of work into. Our company goal is to create Mac software of the highest quality with the best user experience possible. I myself dropped out of school recently to pursue a path in the Mac software industry, and you yourself have been a consistent inspiration for me.</p>
<p>If there is anything at all you can do with regards to this matter, we would be most grateful.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>John Devor</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And Steve replied:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Change your apps name. Not that big of a deal.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
<p>Sent from my iPhone</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So they changed the name of their app to <a href="http://thelittleappfactory.com/irip/">iRip</a>. Fair enough! [<a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2009/11/19/apple-change-name/">CrunchGear</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408729/steve-jobs-responds-to-passionate-app-developer-curtly]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408729]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[blockquote]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipodrip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[irip]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[the little app factory]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:25:52 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Frucci]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408729&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Sign Documents on Your iPhone Through Zosh App]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><object width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo embeddedVideo videoObject_0"><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6685108&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1">
<param name="allowFullScreen" value="true">
<embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6685108&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="500" height="375" class="left gawkerVideo"></object><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/6685108.jpg"></a>Every time I receive an emailed loan agreement for a product review, the process of signing it becomes a complete pain. I either have to print, sign and scan the document, or paste a signature in Photoshop. No more!</p>

<p>Zosh is a $3 app that allows you to sign attached documents on your iPhone. Basically, you forward the emailed document to Zosh from the iPhone's mail app, then you open the Zosh app to sign it (plus you can add a date and stuff).</p>
<p>Testing the app, the signing process actually work pretty well. Maybe the neatest component of the interface is that the signature line auto tracks your finger, meaning that if your signature goes larger than the iPhone's screen, it'll just pan over.</p>
<p>However, there's one MASSIVE catch. You can only sign PDFs at the moment, not text files like .docs. For me, that's a dealbreaker (ladies), and hopefully one that will be remedied (through simple auto-conversion or something) in later versions. [<a href="http://zosh.com/">Zosh</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408527/sign-documents-on-your-iphone-through-zosh-app]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408527]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[zosh]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:00:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408527&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Apple Exec Wants You To Puke All Over His Mind-Bending Backyard Deck]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><a rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/11/apple_deck.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_apple_deck.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>Senior Apple Exec Jeff Dauber's passion for technology is matched only by his passion for contemporary art, which is why he called on architect <a href="http://www.faulders-studio.com/">Thom Faulders</a> to build him a backyard deck that is a mind-bending combination of both.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">
gawkerGallery(5408452,3,'Apple Puke Deck');
</script></p>
<blockquote>
<p>The Japanese maple in Jeff Dauber's San Francisco backyard is not at the center of a carbon-sucking vortex. Sorry, sci-fi fans, but the Berkeley-based architect Thom Faulders's perfectly flat deck only looks like its far corner has its own warped gravity. Ever since Francesco Borromini's Gallery Spada, in Rome, forced perspectives and architectural patronage have gone hand in hand, but whereas the Renaissance architect employed a mathematician to make that arcade seem longer through foreshortening, Faulders used 3-D–modeling software to achieve Deformscape's dipping effect.</p>
<p>"I wanted someone to barf when they look at it," says Dauber</p>
</blockquote>
<p>So Dauber serves guests burgers on the built-in grill only to get a perverse satisfaction when they puke it up later on. Nice. But the weirdness doesn't end there. Faulders also designed much of the interior space of the home, turning it into a bachelor pad/art gallery with crazy walls and ceilings that appear to undulate. Needless to say, if you suffer from motion sickness don't hang out with this man. [<a href="http://www.metropolismag.com/story/20091118/flat-out-amazing">Metropolis</a> via <a href="http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/cliff-kuang/design-innovation/apple-execs-backyard-designed-barfing">Fast Company</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408454/apple-exec-wants-you-to-puke-all-over-his-mind+bending-backyard-deck]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408454]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[optical illusions]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[computer modeling]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[deck]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[home improvement]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:20:00 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Fallon]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408454&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
				
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Wow, It Took Him This Long?]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[
<p><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/11/500x_swcasesiphone.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" />Everyone's making money off the iPhone, so that might as well include George Lucas. $30 this December. [<a href="http://shop.starwars.com/catalog/product.xml?topcatID=1300264;product_id=1317538">StarWarsShop</a> via <a href="http://www.chipchick.com/2009/11/star-wars-iphone-case.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ChipChick+%28Chip+Chick%29">ChipChick</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<link><![CDATA[http://gizmodo.com/5408236/wow-it-took-him-this-long]]></link>			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[Gizmodo-5408236]]></guid>
			<category><![CDATA[star wars]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[iphone cases]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
			<category><![CDATA[star wars iphone]]></category>
			<pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:31:52 EST]]></pubDate>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Wilson]]></dc:creator>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gizmodo.com/index.php?op=postcommentfeed&amp;postId=5408236&amp;view=rss&amp;microfeed=true</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		</channel>
</rss>
